Fishing for HAARP?
Yet more dead fish have been washed up on shore. This time in America, but it seems as if this event is happening in larger numbers around the world…
Thousands of dead fish on Jersey shore
Millions of fish dead in Bolivia
Millions of SeasShells appearing on Pakistani Beaches
Different reason have been given from climate change, cold winters and even broken fishing nets. The question is, are we seeing a pattern here? Ie is there an increase in the number of the dead, the frequency at which they appear and their locations?
We would be wrong to think that these events are only just happening as there have always been cases of mass dead. For example in April 2008 there were 1000s of dead fish washed ashore at Mona Lake
But for all the explanations given conventional reports ignore other possibilities – such as extreme pollution of weapons such as HAARP. Are these events connected? Today the BBC also reported that the Haiti quake was “caused by a previously unknown fault”!
Previously unknown?!? Yes maybe. But why is this? Is it due to the new science? Or has this fault been newly created though ‘man-made’ intervention? There are many unexplained events happening around the same time and that implies the likelihood of connection rather than coincidence.
If HAARP technology was used to create the Haiti devastation then it is likely that there would also be a large consequence on ocean life. Yet this seems a long time since the earthquake… Plus there is one more important option here. The death of these animals may not be the result of a main event, but much like a dog is able to sense earthquakes early on these fish may be an indicator of larger events yet to happen…
Mass fish kills off Gulf Coast…
I know this might come as a disappointment to conspiracy theorists, but HAARP does not, and cannot, cause disasters like this. There are three main reasons:
1. The skip distance of the HAARP transmissions is practically zero, so whatever’s being sent up into the ionosphere comes directly down to the HAARP facility. The signal doesn’t go anywhere.
2. HAARP’s antennae array doesn’t allow for long-distance transmission. You’ll notice they’re short vertical ones. To send an HF signal over a long distance, a very long vertical antenna is needed, something resembling a washing line. This bounces the signal off the ground up into the ionosphere at an angle, so it’s reflected back down to a remote location past the horizon.
3. If there was anything remotely classified about what they’re doing in Alaska, the HAARP team wouldn’t release ANY technical information whatsoever.
If there is a facility that’s affecting the weather and harming wildlife, it would be something more like the Steel Yard (Google it) that the Russians were operating during the 1980s. You’ll notice Steel Yard has a massive antennae array very similar to the one I’ve described.
I hear what you’re saying about HAARP – and I also feel that it is used as a ‘quick solution’ by conspiracy theorists for many events. I believe I’m asking people to question these events rather than stating a cause. (perhaps some readers are new to what HAARP is…)
I agree completely with your point 3, which is why when I mention HAARP I’m really thinking of how it’s been developed rather then presented/publicised. Technologies like HAARP (or at least their concepts)are very old now and who really knows how they have been modified – also if they could be used to initiate ‘natural’ disasters then the effects felt may be indirect.
HAARP has now become a general term in itself. There are many similar technologys over the world – who knows how they are being used. I’m already familiar with much of the Russian tech too… “Woody Woodpecker” being a classic – I used to like the cartoon as a child too…
Thanks for you reply though, it is appreciated very much – part of the problem with a small report is that I can’t really discuss things in depth and the audience could have a wide range of awareness – but hopefully it will help people reflect upon other possiblities.
No problem. But the simplest explanation is almost always the correct one – namely that all those fish died because of something in the water, whether it was chemical, sonar, or whatever.
We also know that BP’s chairman went out of his way to keep a lid on how serious the oil leak was (there was another spill this week, BTW), so I’m assuming there’s something BP isn’t telling us.
In any case, something is very seriously wrong, and I hope people start asking questions.
On the other hand, HAARP’s basically just am AM transmitter. The really advanced technology is in the measuring equipment itself. If there is such a ‘secret weapon’, I’m 99% certain it’s a VLF transmitter system roughly the size of Steel Yard.
Yet more dead fish being washed ashore:-
‘Thousands of dead fish surface at mouth of Mississippi River’
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/0823/thousands-dead-fish-surface-mouth-mississippi-river
Here we go again…
Massive fish kill reported in Louisiana
http://uruknet.info/?p=m69755&hd=&size=1&l=e